Hocutt said a number of factors were "spiritedly" discussed: Comment Here is BCS executive director Bill Hancock after the final standings were released, officially pairing Florida State and Auburn in the last BCS-approved national championship before the four-team playoff debuts Bcs vs playoff season: I have said all along that the BCS is the best-case scenario outside of a playoff system.
While I will keep screaming for a playoff, I will also try to remind myself that any system is subject to scrutiny. In the first eight seasons of the BCS contract, the championship game was rotated among the four bowls, with each bowl game hosting the national championship once every four years.
Perhaps the most damning quick observation you can make about the BCS system is that in the twelve meetings between the number one ranked team and the number two ranked team, the number two ranked team has won the game exactly six times.
The BCS continued to purge ranking systems which included margin of victory, causing the removal of the Matthews and Rothman ratings before the season. The change was made because the BCS wanted computer rankings that did not depend heavily on margin of victory.
How is that accurate? Did TCU deserve a shot to play for the national championship? Congresswhich determined that the BCS was not in violation of any laws or constitutional amendments, although this has since been reconsidered and the BCS is currently under renewed federal anti-trust scrutiny from the Justice Department.
Penn State had two wins against top teams Ohio State and Wisconsinbeating the Buckeyes on a blocked field goal return for a score. This system placed twice as much emphasis on polls than computer rankings since there were two polls and an average of six computer rankings and made it highly unlikely that the top team in both polls would be denied a place in the title game, as it happened in the —04 season.
Other purists feel that a playoff will cheapen the significance of the regular season and encourage teams to load up on "soft" non-conference opponents.
There is no formula spitting out answers from group-think poll voters and computers like in the BCS era. The reality is the Buckeyes did struggle at times during the season with their offensive line and playmakers not named Curtis Samuel. As agreed by all 11 conferences, the results of the —07 regular seasons were evaluated to determine which conferences earned automatic qualification for the BCS games that concluded —11 seasons.
In Division I-A football, teams need to peak right away and maintain that consistency throughout the season, from beginning to end. Wins over rivals last a lifetime. BCS supporters will say a playoff will put the remaining bowl games in serious jeopardy.
The BCS used six ranking systems: Yet there is a strong undercurrent of support for a college football playoff "tournament" to be adopted after the current BCS agreement expires.
The polls also have their share of problems, ones I have highlighted in articles throughout the year. Thanks for signing up! Views expressed here are his own. Margin of victory was a key component in the decision of the computer rankings to determine the BCS standings.
This format naturally sets up an atmosphere very similar to the NCAA basketball tournament. Playoff detractors point out that while the BCS has two more years remaining, the Big Ten and Pac have a commitment to the Rose Bowl for three years after that No playoff would be credible without the top teams from those conferences participating.
My feeling, though, is that head-to-head competition, especially late in the year, should trump everything. Penn State This is the argument of, "What about conference championships and head-to-head?
BCS or Playoffs, you make the choice.
Sure, Nebraska has just one loss, but the Cornhuskers also played a much easier schedule than Colorado. The one thing that makes me smile through all of the controversy is that the BCS has sparked an energized debate and created a tremendous amount of interest in college football.
And way back in late August, their heartbreaking loss to a talented Fresno State squad only occurred after the Buffaloes opted to throw the football resulting in an interception instead of kicking what could have been a game-winning field goal. Is this a fair or even a realistic expectation?
Hart has said he just wants to see an open-minded debate on the subject conducted. After combining a number of factors, a final point total was created and the teams that received the 25 lowest scores were ranked in descending order.
In addition, a new computer ranking, the Wesley Colley Matrix, was added.
The month of December and early January would generate a "madness" all its own. Among the playoff backers are a great many athletic directors who represent some major football programs around the country.
It is believed that scheduling a playoff series in December would be problematic because of the difficulties of going head-to-head against the NFL.BCS vs. Playoffs While I support a college playoff, there's an argument to be made Bcs vs playoff the integrity of the regular season.
James Joyner · Monday, January 10, · 19 comments. Dec 06, · Even though the support for the College Football Playoff is resounding when compared to the BCS, here is a look at some of the biggest pros and cons for each. BCS Pro: More Importance Placed on.
The Bowl Championship Series (BCS) The system was in place for the through seasons and in was replaced by the College Football Playoff. The BCS relied on a combination of polls and computer selection methods to determine relative team rankings, and to narrow the field to two teams to play in the BCS National.
SN looks at how the first season of the BCS could have ended had the playoff been in place and included Ohio State and Kansas State, along with Tennessee and FSU. And the four-team playoff, several commissioners agree, is not possible without the BCS.
“History will look back at the BCS and nod its head and say, That was a good thing for college football. Check out the NCAA College Football Polls and Rankings for Week 4.Download